Head-To-Head Survey: Fluence Energy (NASDAQ:FLNC) vs. Hoku (OTCMKTS:HOKUQ)

Fluence Energy (NASDAQ:FLNC) and Hoku (OTCMKTS:HOKUQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.2% of Fluence Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fluence Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Hoku shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Fluence Energy has a beta of 2.49, indicating that its share price is 149% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hoku has a beta of -15, indicating that its share price is 1,600% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fluence Energy and Hoku’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fluence Energy	-0.08%	-0.36%	-0.11%
Hoku	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fluence Energy and Hoku, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fluence Energy	1	15	9	0	2.32
Hoku	0	0	0	0	0.00

Fluence Energy currently has a consensus price target of $14.34, suggesting a potential upside of 171.09%. Given Fluence Energy’s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fluence Energy is more favorable than Hoku.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fluence Energy and Hoku”s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fluence Energy	$2.52 billion	0.38	$22.72 million	($0.05)	-105.80
Hoku	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Fluence Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Hoku.

Summary

Fluence Energy beats Hoku on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Fluence Energy

Fluence Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, offers energy storage products and solution, services, and artificial intelligence enabled software-as-a-service products for renewables and storage applications in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company sells energy storage products with integrated hardware, software, and digital intelligence. Its energy storage products include Gridstack Pro, a large-scale front-of-the-meter application; Gridstack, a front-of-the-meter application; Sunstack, a DC-coupled energy storage product for DC-coupled solar + storage projects; Edgestack, for smaller-scale commercial and industrial use cases; and Ultrastack, for critical system requirements of distribution and transmission networks. The company also provides engineering and delivery services to support the deployment of its storage products; operational and maintenance services; and digital applications. It serves independent power producers, developer, utilities, and other generators. Fluence Energy, Inc. was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. Fluence Energy, Inc. is a joint venture of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft and The AES Corporation.

About Hoku

Hoku Corporation operates as a solar energy products and services company primarily in the United States. It focuses on manufacturing polysilicon, a primary material used in the manufacture of photovoltaic (PV) modules; and designing, engineering, and installing turnkey PV systems and related services in Hawaii using solar modules purchased from third-party suppliers. The company was formerly known as Hoku Scientific, Inc. and changed its name to Hoku Corporation in March 2010. Hoku Corporation was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. On July 2, 2013, Hoku Corporation along with its affiliates filed a voluntary petition for liquidation under Chapter 7 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho.